Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Thursday, February 15, 2024

What happened at #HollywoodFL City Mgr.'s office in June 2023 that led to firing of Dir. of Development Services? I and many other Hollywood civic activists + residents have VERY LITTLE confidence in CM George R. Keller, Jr., who's MORE of what we want LESS of.

What happened at #HollywoodFL City Mgr.'s office in June 2023 that led to firing of Dir. of Development Services? I and many other Hollywood civic activists + residents have VERY LITTLE confidence in CM George R. Keller, Jr., who's MORE of what we want LESS of.



Back on September 19th, I received a very lengthy email from a very savvy and well-connected Hollywood civic activist friend. Someone who is noted for both their genuine alacrity as well as their longstanding desire for Hollywood to be a MUCH BETTER place to live and MUCH BETTER managed. They share with me and so many of my friends and fellow Hollywood civic activists for many of the anti-democratic and authoritarian excesses of the past several years at Hollywood City Hall to be rolled back, and for the people responsible for implementing those policies FINALLY being held to account.

They/We are tired of Hollywood being on the slippery slope and becoming something that we frequently don't even recognize when it comes to the caliber and competency of both the elected officials and high-ranking, highly-paid city bureaucrats, in what has always been a very liberal city that had taxes far too high to be justified by the ROI and the self-evident results.

The fact that very liberal Hollywood was the last large city in South Florida to finally institute police body cameras is perhaps the best example of the city's virtue-signaling ringing hollow when it comes time to putting their money where their mouth was. They would NOT pay for it initially out of the city budget -as most other localities have- but instead, waited and waited and waited until it received a non-city funding source, via largesse from Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. 

WHY? 

You should ask Mayor Josh Levy that very question next time you see him tooling around town as he runs for re-election. 

NOT A SHOCKER: I will NOT be voting for him in November!

Given the amount of crime that takes place in Hollywood and HPD's well-known and less-than-stellar reputation over the years, how could Hollywood have been among the last of South Florida cities to come into the light when it was and is a city that was tailor-made to have the devices as soon as they were available? Especially when the public here was repeatedly assured by City Hall and HPD that it was so important to implement such a system? Exactly.

I've chronicled that particular cat-and-mouse sleight of hand many times before on this blog, as well as in fact-filled emails around the area and very pointed tweets on my popular Twitter feed, @hbbtruthhttps://twitter.com/hbbtruth/with_replies    

Here was my last blog post about it, last year on January 31st:

#Memphis Police Body Camera video release is a great time to recall that 74 months into reign of Josh Levy as #HollywoodFL mayor, he still can NOT give the public a firm date when it, the LARGEST #SoFL city STILL w/o #police body cameras, will have them. 😳🙄🤨🤔

https://twitter.com/hbbtruth/status/1623206932071825409



Since I received that email in September from a friend, roughly 5 months ago -back when Miami Dolphins fans here and elsewhere were yet again getting their hopes up about FINALLY returning to the Super Bowl after 39 years of frustration since their last appearance -I've been waiting, semi-patiently, for the right moment to finally drop this email on you faithful readers of the blog.

That way, those of you who never knew about this conflict, or, only heard snippets of what was reportedly said or written at the time, could read it for yourselves, and see the facts and arguments as they were stated at the time. 

Not some historic revisionism of the sort that this city's elected officials of past and present have been so prone to do for SO many years, as is well-known by local reporters.

Years where inconvenient facts and public records are erased or misplaced and memorable arguments for or against a particular policy were forgotten by the very people in charge who consistently made bad decisions and showed very poor judgment at the time. 

So many bad decisions, so many mistakes in judgment! 

And look what happened in September to one of the persons who used to have a large -some say  oversized influence- on what actually happened on a daily basis at Hollywood City Hall, Shiv Newaldass, who worked for over 8 years for the city. 

Chief Development Officer from Jun 2015 - March 2021, then Director of Development Services from October 2018 - June 2023.

I first met him and spoke to him during a break of a meeting of the city's very important Evaluation Committee back in 2016, a meeting where I was the only member of the public actually present for a P3 meeting in a small room on the third floor. A room that was otherwise full of city employees and real estate developers and their attorneys. Judging by what was said and done -and meetings are NOT taped- it was hard to see who was there in the room to be the eyes and ears of the public's best long-term interests besides myself.  

Well, cutting to the chase, the city has DISAPPEARED him from its website and archives.

A person whose name used to be a cc or bcc on nearly every other important city document for YEARS, which is one of the reason he was making roughly $182,000 a year.



 

Here's the link to his LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/shiv-newaldass/


Back in September, I hoped to have more useful context her so I could once and for all connect-the-dots on a few important matters and policy issues that have been percolating in the city for quite a while, and to use this situation as but the latest example of what was going on under-the-radar, and NEVER seeing the light of day in the South Florida Sun Sentinel or at any of the four English language TV stations serving South Florida. 

But seeing as how many of those avenues have either dried-up because information has gone curiously missing, or, rather suddenly, people who used to be fonts of reliable information here in our community suddenly got cold feet and went radio silent, apparently, wanting me to forget what they already told me and then being unwilling to go on-the-record, I'm dropping this today.

I've deleted the personal contact information of not only the person who first shared it with me, as well as people they sent it to besides myself.

That is also a reminder that in the year 2024, there's still no extant diagram on the city's website detailing the exact chain of command in the city, with a clear delineation of not just who's who, but who gets to prevent other ideas and POVs from going forward.

When in doubt, contact me directly, and I'll share them with you.


For the record, here's the city's current sanitized biography for City Manager George R. Keller, Jr.

https://www.hollywoodfl.org/863/City-Manager-George-Keller-Bio


Date: Wed, Sep 20, 2023, 11:17 AM
Subject: ICYMI: Wow! Email I just received re City of Hollywood's Shiv Newaldass, until recently, the city's Director of Development Services

-----

From: Shiv Newaldass 
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 12:27 AM
To: George R. Keller JR CPPT 
Subject: [EXT]For the Record

City Manager Keller,

On the eve of my promised termination, a note for the record.

For those of us called to public service, working for the City of Hollywood had always felt a privilege.  For the past 8 years, together, as part of the City’s Executive Management team, we achieved a tremendous amount through a style that can best be described as collaborative disruption.  Empowered to do more, take chances, question each other, and push/pull the City forward, we did.  Prior to your appointment to the City Manager position, you and I met to discuss expectations.  Our rapport, one of ease and transparency, was grounded on what I understood be mutual respect.  As an atypical Director, we bonded on shared values and a sense that service can be more business like.  I was inspired by you and you often told me how much I reminded you of your own career.  I was honored. 

When your candidacy was being considered, I shared my enthusiasm with those in the public, including some elected officials.  When probed about fears regarding a potential stylistic difference relative to the preceding City Manager, I continued to express my support, assured by you, of the same values. 

The irony in all of this, months after championing your ascension and attempting to allay fears over a reputation of petty vindictiveness, I never imagined being on the receiving end as to what one can only describe as a targeted campaign to oust me from the City of Hollywood- a “Special Project” of sorts.     

Since the beginning of your administration in April, in an effort to deliver “more, better, faster”, work has devolved into a toxic, hostile environment.  These past few weeks have introduced new experiences in my professional career that have both jarred and terrified me.  Your reputation for “decisiveness”, especially with regards to personnel issues, has always troubled those of us witnessing it on the outside, yet we remained silent. 

You would often say that “people fire themselves” and that you never took any delight in the actions required.  I wanted to believe you even as colleagues departed under spurious circumstances and often, a one-sided rationalization.  So, I remained silent. 

Earlier this year, at our the site visit for a bicycle rental operation to resolve ongoing tension with Jorge Camejo, you told me “not to worry, he’s a Special Projects of yours”.  Shamefully, I remained silent. 

When at our March 6th meeting, you noted that Gus Zambrano, another “Special Project” of yours, “did not have the votes”, yet again I remained silent.

I am not exactly certain when the change occurred or why between us, but to unpack, I can only speculate that it has to do with my concerns about the Orangebrook vote. 

During the process, I raised some concerns about rumored tactics being utilized by one of the firms.  I cautioned, for the sake of transparency in the process, to make certain members of the Commission and potential respondents not communicate outside of the Cone of Silence.  I spoke up during the evaluation meetings to emphasis an “apples to apples” comparison rather than “apples to kangaroos”.    The day of the award, I unfortunately commented that the specific ranking was the “worst outcome” for the City.  You shot me a glance and someone else pulled me aside, warning not to say such things in front of you. 

At the time, Real Estate, was under Development Services, and I had been the lead negotiator for the City on a number of transactions prior, including 1301.  When the team was being put together, Dave Keller, a truly exceptional person and professional, was selected to lead negotiations, I was intrigued by the approach yet pleasantly surprised when he took control over a very complicated process with aplomb.

Early meetings indicated an opportunity to work diligently with the top rank firm to meet a very ambitious schedule.  I was excited to participate and share feedback as we worked through a series of interconnected agreements detailing risks, obligations, guarantees, and numbers.  With an MBA in Real Estate, a penchant for numbers, and an understanding of development, this was my natural element.

When Real Estate was reassigned from me on April 24th, you and I not spoken as to your thought process.  As the City Manager, that is your prerogative; however, I had hoped to understand further or delve deeper with the newly appointed Assistant City Manager, Raelin Storey, as to how best to proceed given our different styles.  This never happened.    When my role on the team was diminished, the justification was to focus on “building” issues.  Given my background, this seemed odd.             

When half of Development Services, inclusive of Real Estate, was removed from under my purview, the first time you made note of it was at another first for me- an impromptu disciplinary meeting on April 26th. 

Building had been receiving an inordinate amount of complaints and while an innovative “team based” approach was presented to the City Commission on March 15th and an April 19th meeting that created 11 new positions for DS, you seemed particularly concerned that not enough had been done.  You requested a meeting at 10 am with HR, Finance, and DS to talk about the “change” in approach for Building.  You demanded to know why “no one told you” that the “pay study” had shifted from your direction in December to pay the highest levels for inspectors and plans examiners, to the impending “team” structure.  As we attempted to explain that there were multiple meetings conducted since December, inclusive of you, to discuss this revised approach and was ultimately presented to the City Commission on March 15th.  You even gave two thumbs up after the presentation.  This seemed to have upset you as you immediately demanded that Gus, Tammie, and I meet in your office. 

The moments after became the worst professional experience of my life, only to be trumped by your later actions.  I sat across from you as you pointed your finger at Gus and I, blaming primarily me as the Director for the complaints.  You then instructed Tammie to place in my personnel file an improvement plan with probation promised if I could not deliver on certain milestones by June 30th.  As I stood up to leave, I extended my hand to you.  Your initial hesitation baffled me, but as I shrugged it off, you took my still extended hand and said “this is why Real Estate and Community Development was taken away from you”.  I was not sure how to respond, so I remained silent and smiled.  This seemed to have annoyed you further as you then preceded to berate me for not knowing that one of my division manager had accepted a position with another city.  You demanded that I answer whether or not it was “right” that you knew about it and I hadn’t.  I remained silent and turned to leave.  You then remarked, Code is being take away and given to PD and that this will help me focus on permitting issues.  Half of team was gone and I remained silent.

The letter that was issued later that day, hand-delivered, noted that I had to have all positions filled by June 30th, including the newly created ones.  The other mention was a reduction in complaints and mention that I had provided unsatisfactory improvements.  The letter also referenced a meeting that you and I supposedly had on or about March 31st- the day after the previous City Manager had retired and a Friday.  Unfortunately, this meeting or conversation never happened and the metrics demanded, to many would appear a fool’s errand. 

I wanted to believe that I could do this and continued a manic effort to meet what would become an irrational mad dash.  Each day became a new exercise in trying to fathom what would be a potential minefield with you, but I wanted to believe that your “guidance” was for the best. 

On May 30th, at 6:30, I was summoned to your office. With Raelin and Tammie there, you presented a “finding”, a narrative of an incident that occurred on April 11th between one of my division managers and self.  I read a description that presented me in the worst light possible.  Colleagues that I had worked with for years, my team, prescribing statements to me that I found to be troubling.  I would later find out that some of the statements were not made by the people attributed.  You demanded a response and I asked for more time to digest the information shared.  I was surprised by it all, especially given that the incident had occurred 45 days prior and we had spoken directly about it immediately after.  I asked why now, and you claimed it was because the Union was asking you to do this (records request indicate a different story).  This was not acceptable to you as you insisted that I respond right of way.  I implored for some time, turned to the Human Resources Director, tried to be as balanced as I could be, understanding in that moment what was happening.  You called me a liar and that the problem has “always been me”.  Years of working hand in hand together, I was gutted.  You had been someone I looked up to as a mentor and friend.  Without much to say, you then pulled out of your notebook a pre-written disciplinary letter issuing a 3 day suspension without pay.  It seemed excessive, especially in light of your own behavior towards many of us, including that very moment. 

The panic attacks, the sleepless nights, weight loss, fear of retaliation, and feeling overwhelmed, I reached out to my Therapist.  He suggested that I stay away from such a toxic, hostile work environment, and recommended Family Medical leave with an intense, weekly therapy sessions and a referral to a psychiatrist for further assistance.    I reached out inquiring as to the process and then the harassment amplified thereafter.  Prior to a formal designation, on a call with Tammie Hechler, she insisted that I consider a separation agreement instead of FMLA.  Jarred, I told her I would consider, but given my emotional state and the life changing outcome such an action would have, please allow me some time.  She then noted that there was an allegation of impropriety with a contractor that they would be investigating if I did not accept a separation agreement.  I laughed at first, knowing it to be baseless, especially when told that said contractor would not even identify themselves.  I insisted that any investigation that is required to be done is thorough and hopefully impartially.  I told her that I would be prepared to address fully whenever those findings come forward as I have always acted in highest ethical manner in furtherance of my job for the City.  Ultimately, I had to insist that I be afforded the same rights other employees are provided as mental health is a serious concern for the City, or so we are lead to believe.  Reluctantly, she agreed and I was approved to be out through June 16th.

Access to emails and facilities were cut, on the guise of me not being able to work on City related matters while out on FMLA.  I was curious to know more about the “allegation”, but no one followed up and have since been told that this “allegation” would not be pursued further.   

For a few days, I thought I was becoming more centered with therapy and better habits.  Realizing that my time at the City was nearing an end, I began thinking of my future and what could be an alternative career.  Little did I know that colleagues of mine were actively seeking negative information to help identify further possible improprieties.  Figuring out my mental well-being as my employer targets me continued to overwhelm and baffle me.  I realized that this would never stop and my time at the City was effectively over.    A draft separation agreement was shared by Tammie Hechler on Saturday, June 10th.  Without being able to fully respond, another version was sent by Tami Thornton on Tuesday, June 13th at 4 pm.   

I was told that I needed to have a response to you by noon the following day. 

Within this June 13th agreement, I would be forgoing an incredible amount of rights and be subject to future actions by the City.  I was perplexed by this, only to learn that I am now being investigated for “Fraud”.  As persona non-grata at the City, hearing this information secondhand through the industry, imagine my genuine surprise and disappointment.  I gave up, as it was clear that the City, directed through you, was seeking not only to run my professional reputation but life as well.  I was told that City Managers have almost absolute authority and the unlimited resources of an in house legal team.  Be prepared for years of a legal fight and no future in government afterwards.  As a person who felt called  and has dedicated most of my career towards public service, this is intimidating and overwhelming. 

Before 11 am, I responding with a draft, unreviewed by an attorney, accepting the terms presented by Tammie Hechler on June 10th and some language that would allow me to defend myself of any future allegation. 

At 11:48, Tammie Hechler called to tell me that the only draft that would be accepted in the one sent over by Tami Thornton without any changes.  I inquired as to why the significant change to the terms, especially in light of accrued leave, inclusive of sick time, being not paid out in full.  She said you were not willing to do so and that if I did not sign yesterday, would be fired on Monday.  I told her that I did not want to be coerced into signing such a document that forgoes so many rights.  I was promised to be fired on Monday.  At 11:52, Tammie called back to move the date up the date of my termination to Friday, June 16th, per your direction, as she had just gotten off a call with you.

I told her that I would not be coming in, on a day the City is not opened, while I am still out on FMLA, to be fired.  If this is the only option, then I would have to seek legal assistance. 

Assuming that this time was meant to be for me to recover, the harassment and continuous threats the City, per your direction, continues to overwhelm as the uncertainty of my career, the way I can provide for my family, has been debilitating. 

While I have not been the first of your “Special Projects”, I highly doubt I will be the last.  I am reminded of a recent commission meeting at which, this statement was referred:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out- Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out- Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me- and there was no one left to speak for me.

- Martin Niemuller 

I will not remain silent anymore and given that your commitment to ruining my life, I believe others should be aware of who you are.  Others will speak up eventually, but my biggest regret remains not addressing your intimidating, threatening, petty tendencies sooner when doing to others. 

At this point, I am looking forward, as painful as it is going to be, to having an opportunity to clear my name, as best as I can.  I am confident in my past actions.  I hope the same for you and that “team” of yours, so willing to go deep and dark, so quickly.  Public records are quite revealing.       

Shiv

-------
More on this in coming weeks!

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/SFBJRealEstate?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SFBJRealEstate</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/RedBroward?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RedBroward</a> What happened at <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/HollywoodFL?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#HollywoodFL</a> City Mgr.&#39;s office in June 2023 that led to firing of Dir. of Development Services? I + many other Hollywood civic activists + residents have VERY LITTLE confidence in new CM George R. Keller, Jr. 😠<a href="https://t.co/vTgt1jfVjp">https://t.co/vTgt1jfVjp</a> <a href="https://t.co/800Z16wFcS">pic.twitter.com/800Z16wFcS</a></p>&mdash; HallandaleBeach/Hollywood Blog (@hbbtruth) <a href="https://twitter.com/hbbtruth/status/1758213515423134114?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 15, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Dave

Photo of me, 2017 November.jpg
David Bruce Smith,  +1 (786815-9440
Email: hallandalebeachblog@gmail

Hallandale Beach/Hollywood Bloghttp://www.hallandalebeachblog.blogspot.com/
Twitter: @hbbtruth, https://twitter.com/hbbtruth/with_replies
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-bruce-smith-b945b376/


Monday, November 6, 2023

re Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody's office fighting a ruling on lobbying restrictions on Florida's elected officials: The cautionary tale of Steve Geller and Joe Gibbons track record makes a reasonable person realize we NEED even stronger and more meaningful ethics laws in the Sunshine State



re Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody's office fighting a ruling on lobbying restrictions on Florida's elected officials: The cautionary tale of Steve Geller and Joe Gibbons track record makes a reasonable person realize we NEED even stronger and more meaningful ethics laws in the Sunshine State 

As I have told most of you loyal readers of the blog via emails or in-person since before 2018 -some of you, in fact, SEVERAL TIMES!- I truly wish the Florida law mentioned last week in Florida Trend, below, had been a state law in effect back when: 

a.) Present-day Broward County Commissioner Steve Geller was a state senator, with a public office located at Hallandale Beach City Hall no less.
In theory if not practice, Geller was supposed to be representing the citizens and stakeholders of Hallandale Beach in the Florida state Senate in Tallahassee, yet at the time, was free to legally lobby AGAINST their interests -as well as those of HB's elected officials- on behalf of any of his lobbying clients, and,

b.) Joe Gibbons, the ex-Hallandale Beach City Commissioner and then-Florida state Representative -so, like Steve Geller above, in theory, representing the interests of citizens and small business owners of Hallandale Beach and West Park in the Florida House of Representatives in Tallahassee- yet, Gibbons was legally free to lobby AGAINST the interests of the city's residents, stakeholders and elected officials, on behalf of his other clients. And did.

Clients that Hallandale Beach citizens and stakeholders were completely unaware of, even if a particular project he was somehow financially involved in was being discussed on local TV newscasts or in the Miami Herald or South Florida Sun Sentinel, since unless his name is specifically mentioned, how would you know he was connected to it?
You wouldn't.

In one particular egregious case regarding Joe Gibbons WHILE he was a Florida state Representative, a case that I chronicled here on the blog MANY TIMES at the time, Gibbons was working FOR the interests of a large, well-heeled South Florida real estate development company involving a VERY UNPOPULAR development proposal on the beach. Specifically, one proposed for 2000 S. Ocean Drive.
What is now referred to as 2000 Ocean, below.





A proposed development that was opposed by both the city residents living closest to it, at the Parker Plaza condos, as well as the majority of the rest of the community.




The latter, a reflection of the fact that the city's elected officials, City Manager and CRA officials seemed even more intent than usual in bending over and rushing the project through with as little public engagement and input, and handicapping the public by NOT making PUBLIC INFORMATION available to me and them as soon as it was available.
(Yes, not only the common thread but actually the default position of Hallandale Beach elected officials and City Managers since I first returned to South Florida 20 years ago, after working and living in Washington, D.C. for roughly 15 years, often on behalf of some of the largest of Fortune 500 companies, and the nation's most influential law firms, PACs and lobbying groups.)

Typically for Broward County pols, where no interest looms larger than self-interest, Joe Gibbons did all of this while he was running against first-term incumbent Beam Furr for his Broward County Commission seat representing SE Broward County, including Hollywood. 
If you were a normal person, you'd think that the issue would have caused the South Florida news media to be all over it, given that it was happening while Gibbons was campaigning for public office again.
But you'd be wrong.

As I wrote about many times here on the blog, absolutely ZERO members of South Florida's press corps, print or TV or even NPR affiliate WLRN, were interested in asking any hard questions about that particular arrangement, despite the unethical optics of it, to say nothing of the huge amount Gibbons reportedly would have received if he had succeeded: $200,000 according to well-informed people involved in the process.

And the worst part of all, a FACT that I wrote about then on my blog and in emails to many of you, Gibbons NEVER even did the bare minimum the city's extant ethics and lobbying laws REQUIRED.

That is, Gibbons never filed the required lobbying docs at HB City Hall, as every other lobbyist is required to do, yet he had many conversations with City Commissioners and top city staffers at the time, including several with unethical Comm. Anthony Sanders, a man who later was forced out by Broward Inspector General John Scott because of Sanders steering nearly a million dollars in HB CRA funds to his family and friends, naturally, because the city was unwilling and unable to do even the most basic oversight of the millions of dollars in the city's CRA pot.
(For the record, the Miami Herald has STILL never reported in-print that he was forced to resign -or else!)

That Joe Gibbons, who lived in Jacksonville with his family while he was a state Representative, while claiming, falsely, to be a full-time bona fide Hallandale Beach resident, was a great believer of rules for you and me, but NOT for him. Surprise!

Even now we STILL don't know who the real priorities of Steve Geller and Joe Gibbons were when they were public officials in Tallahassee or Broward County: the public or their own financial interests?




---

NEWS SERVICE OF FLORIDA
Florida attorney general's office fights a ruling on a lobbying restriction
Jim Saunders | The News Service of Florida | 10/26/2023

Pointing to securing the “public trust,” Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office has asked a federal appeals court to overturn a decision that blocked part of a 2018 state constitutional amendment imposing new restrictions
on lobbying.

U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom this summer issued a permanent injunction against a restriction on state and local officials lobbying other government bodies while in office. Bloom said the restriction violated First Amendment rights.

But in a 62-page brief filed Wednesday at the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, lawyers in Moody’s office disputed that the restriction is unconstitutional and said paid “lobbying by public officials threatens the integrity of and public confidence in democracy.”

Florida’s restriction alleviates the threat of financial quid pro quos and their appearance in a direct and material way,” the brief said. “It prevents elected and executive-level officers, who wield political influence, from taking, or appearing to take, dollars … for political favors … in derogation of public trust.”

The 2018 amendment, which was proposed by the state Constitution Revision Commission, sought to bar public officials from lobbying “for compensation on issues of policy, appropriations, or procurement before the federal government, the Legislature, any state government body or agency, or any political subdivision of this state, during his or her term of office.”

The remaining plaintiff in the case is Miami-Dade County Commissioner Rene Garcia, after Bloom ruled that another plaintiff, South Miami Mayor Javier Fernandez, did not have legal standing.

Garcia, a former state House member and senator, is executive vice president of New Century Partnership, a firm that provides lobbying and other services. Garcia said he turned down at least two clients who sought lobbying services for legislative appropriations in Tallahassee because of the restriction, according to Bloom’s ruling.

In the filing Wednesday, Moody’s office took issue with the injunction applying to officials across the state. The brief said that if Bloom’s ruling is upheld, it should apply only to Garcia.

“Because Garcia’s injury is limited to the fear of enforcement against him, the court could have afforded complete relief by enjoining the state defendants from enforcing the restriction against only him,” the brief said. “By enjoining the restriction as to all public officers in the state, the district court departed from traditional equitable practice.”

Bloom, who is based in South Florida, ruled that the 2018 constitutional amendment and a law that carried it out placed “content-based, overbroad restrictions on speech.”

“Contrary to defendants’ assertion, the in-office restrictions target speech based on the context of the speech and its content,” Bloom wrote.

But the state’s brief Wednesday said that “no matter the public office or the lobbied government entity making political decisions, Florida has a substantial interest in preventing officeholders from being (or appearing to be) bought and paid for in the political arena while holding public office in public trust.”

Bloom did not block another part of the voter-approved amendment that restricts former state and local officials from lobbying for six years after leaving office.

Monday, November 7, 2022

Did the Pandemic Change How You Feel re #HollywoodFL? Yes. Hollywood residents and stakeholders no longer see the city as "special" and they personally blame the Mayor, City Commission, City Manager, and City Attorney for abusing their trust and sending the city in the wrong direction

Did the Pandemic Change How You Feel re #HollywoodFL? Yes. Hollywood residents and stakeholders no longer see the city as "special" and they personally blame the Mayor, City Commission, City Manager, and City Attorney for abusing their trust and sending the city in the wrong direction


This post today is the Reader's Digest version of what dozens and dozens of well-informed people from every part of Hollywood have been telling me and my friend and fellow civic activist, Catherine "Cat" Uden in detail for well over a year: they believe that the city has gone completely in the wrong direction, and that self-evident fact has led increasingly larger number of Hollywood citizens, residents and stakeholders to get more angry and feel bitter at Hollywood City Hall than they ever imagined they could. 

That's especially true for Hollywood's most involved residents who follow every move the city makes publicly, and who, in the past, had always thought of these elected officials as simply friends and neighbors in a position to positively influence the future direction of this city.

Now that's NOT anger at the City Hall building, obviously, but rather at the very people there who've been entrusted with running the city in the best and most transparent way possible, people like the City Commission's members, all of whom took an actual oath to follow, protect and defend the Florida constitution. But they aren't doing that. Far from it.

Based on our one-on-one conversations in-person, over the telephone, and in the many emotional and exasperated emails and texts Cat and I receive, a very clear majority of the city's best and most informed residents personally believe that the Mayor, the City Commission and several people in the City Manager and City Attorney's offices, have knowingly and deliberately lied to the public and abused their longstanding trust in small and subtle ways that has left them shaken, if not in despair for this city's future. 

Now, they no longer believe that "Hollywood is different."

There in no one I know and respect here in Hollywood who feels the city's elected officials and  top bureaucrats response during/after has been anywhere close to satisfactory. 

Even people who always disagree with each other AGREE on this!

More on this matter at length after the election. An election that has been without any organized in-person candidate debates or forums of any kind, which has only angered people more, because they wonder where the groups are that in the past were involved in hosting those very things at locations throughout the city, and especially in Downtown and over on Hollywood Beach.  

There are a lot of people in this city who have an awful lot to answer for.



https://twitter.com/UdenCatherine/status/1580530579807748097



https://twitter.com/UdenCatherine/status/1585436563634520064




------------------

Read the whole thing in its original form: https://twitter.com/hbbtruth/status/1586756350184398850

2/ Instead, #HollywoodFL has INCREASED secrecy re PUBLIC info/facts/context, and is ACTIVELY avoiding normalcy, INSISTING on online mtgs. for important matters -inc. P3's- instead of returning to in-person engagement. ALL to avoid PUBLIC accountability!


3/ For 10 months, #LindaSherwood, a #Macon #GA-area woman has been VOTING as elected official in #HollywoodFL, city she's NOT been legal resident of since B4 roughly mid-January at latest, based on HER signed @FHAgov docs re primary residency.


4/ #HollywoodFL's City Mgr/City Atty/Mayor/City Comm. have engaged in a criminal conspiracy to keep #LindaSherwood on dais, meaning her one-time constituents are repped by a no-show #GA resident, yet gets salary/benefits fm taxpayers while violating #FL Constitution.

5/ Instead of #HollywoodFL citizens being fully represented @ City Hall by a person who legally LIVES in city where they do -as they are legally entitled to- they are, instead, "represented" by #GA resident who CONTINUALLY breaks multiple state/federal laws w/impunity.



6/ Why is this #SoFL town's City Mgr./City Atty./Mayor/City Comm. seemingly engaging in a criminal conspiracy -against their own city's citizens- to keep #LindaSherwood on dais @ #HollywoodFL City Hall, despite KNOWING she has/is breaking MULTIPLE #FL + U.S. laws?


7/ The answer, like so many criminal cases involving public corruption @ #SoFL City Halls is #RealEstate. These #HollywoodFL officials need to KEEP her YES vote to build a luxury condo tower -on public land!- for multimillionaires, 5x's higher than zoning allows.


8/ Say hi to #LindaSherwood, a Lizella, #GA resident for 10 months, yet STILL a voting member of #HollywoodFL City Comm. She LIVES 570 miles away -and city KNOWS it! I + public wonder when this charade ends and someone is ARRESTED.

Tuesday, December 22, 2020

So where are the positive results and ROI of all the tens of thousands of dollars that Hallandale Beach CRA gave to FIU's Chaplin School of Hospitality & Tourism Management and to the South Beach Wine & Food Festival? South Florida news media collectively yawns.

 


So, I've got a bit of a secret to share with you loyal readers of the Hallandale Beach/Hollywood Blog today, just days before Christmas 2020. The COVID19 Christmas none of us wanted to go through.

Well, actually, it's NOT much of a secret. I mean, to be honest, it's been hiding in plain sight.
And certainly I've been talking about it to many people in emails, texts, and phone calls and in-person conversations at some of the handful of haunts in the area that were open and convenient for others to meet me over the past few months. Which includes a handful of the community-minded people reading this blog post today.

So here's the story in slightly more than a nutshell.
Hard-working and concerned residents and a few civic activists of Hallandale Beach -and to be fair, a few well-informed and concerned Broward County insiders who live elsewhere, like me in Hollywood- have been wondering for most of this year about a shoe that never seemed to fall from the sky.
Wondering, mostly, why nobody in the South Florida press corps was the least bit interested in investigating and reporting on YET ANOTHER Hallandale Beach CRA scandal that's been sitting there on a silver platter for nearly all of 2020, just waiting for someone to simply look at the self-evident facts and the public data, and metaphorically kick the tires and connect-the-dots.

Someone who would logically explain why, once again, the elected officials of Hallandale Beach were consciously choosing to spend many tens of thousands of dollars that the State of Florida mandates be used on matters centering chiefly on the removal of (self-evident) blight and slums in this city located in the SE corner of Broward County, right on the Atlantic Ocean. 

A city that should be, as I have argued for the soon-to-be 13 years of this blog, MUCH BETTER in all sorts of ways that matter to the people who live and work there and call it home, regardless of race, gender, political sensibility or economic status.
The people I know best and trust the most in Hallandale Beach are long past being tired of continual half-assed PR efforts to make unsatisfactory look passable, and deliberate stupidity look like a policy choice.

Specifically, they've been waiting for someone to investigate why tens of thousands of CRA dollars was given to the FIU Chaplin School of Hospitality & Tourism Management and to the South Beach Wine & Food Festival, for what, in the end, seems to have been... nothing but positive PR buzz.
Like self-publishing a vanity book using someone else's money.

No, there would be no unsightly, curb-unfriendly slums in Hallandale Beach to be razed, no HB neighborhoods that would be improved by this transaction.
But it would allow a handful of not-so-sharp elected officials in Broward to once again pat themselves on the back for imagining that they'd pulled the wool over the nearly 40,000 residents of the city and the perpetually sleepwalking news media of South Florida.
The same news media that somehow imagines that whatever happens in the Wynwood neighborhood of Miami, or over on Miami Beach, always seems to trump all other local news, no matter how banal or cringe-worthy those stories in those two places might be.


Since the local South Florida press corps didn't seem the least bit interested in investigating or reporting on this story involving bad to corrupt public policy and use of public funds, with a lot of curiosity and resolve, and fueled by some hazelnut coffee and a delicious steak + egg sandwich -with bacon!- I connected-the-dots on the latest #HallandaleBeach CRA scandal re $$$ given to #FIU + #SOBEWFF- in one afternoon at the Hollywood Panera Bread on Sheridan Street near where I live, all while listening to a college football game on the radio.
 
I'll be posting the results in 2021 right here on the blog.
I may even use this issue as a reason to once again start uploading some more original content to my YouTube Channel, after not doing that for many years.
I'd been itching to do that for month, as well as start posting more original content at Instagram, until #COVID19 struck and a lot of election year ideas and plans went by the wayside.


https://twitter.com/hbbtruth/status/1341464316533477388?s=20